Evidence of the circumstances in which, a few days before the commencement of an action against owners of land, they conveyed the land for a substantial price to a young immigrant who purportedly borrowed the amount of the price upon his unsecured note, together with evidence of a conveyance of the land by the immigrant to the purported lender and his wife a few months later and of a simultaneous cancellation of the note and evidence that the immigrant subsequently said to the plaintiff in the action "I never did own.223, § 127." The tenant excepted to the finding and decision of the court, to the order that judgment be entered for the demandant, to the denial of his requests for rulings, and to rulings on matters of evidence, hereinafter to be considered. 109A that judgment is to be entered for the demandant and that an execution for costs is to issue in accordance with the provisions of G.L. The judge found "that the demandant is a creditor within the meaning of the statute that the judgment is wholly unsatisfied that the present action was commenced within the period allowed under the statute that the property was transferred to the tenant with actual fraudulent intent to defraud, hinder and delay creditors that the transfer was made for the purpose of preventing the satisfaction of any execution issuing upon a judgment which might be obtained by the demandant in his action at law that the demandant was in fact hindered, delayed and defrauded by said conveyance that the tenant knew of the fraudulent purpose of the trustees that the tenant participated in said fraudulent purpose and that the transfer was a fraudulent conveyance." He ruled "that the interest or title in the demanded premises was fraudulently conveyed within the meaning of the `Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Law,' G.L.
with actual intent, as distinguished from intent presumed in law, to hinder, delay or defraud either present or future creditors, is fraudulent as to both present and future creditors." Go to
0 kommentar(er)
